Deep-learning-based reconstruction of T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate accelerated by compressed sensing provides improved image quality at half the acquisition time.

Background: Deep-learning-based reconstruction (DLR) improves the quality of magnetic resonance (MR) images which allows faster acquisitions. The aim of this study was to compare the image quality of standard and accelerated T2 weighted turbo-spin-echo (TSE) images of the prostate reconstructed with and without DLR and to find associations between perceived image quality and calculated image characteristics. Methods: In a cohort of 47 prospectively enrolled consecutive patients referred for bi-parametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), two T2-TSE acquisitions in the transverse plane were acquired on a 3T scanner-a standard T2-TSE sequence and a short sequence accelerated by a factor of two using compressed sensing (CS). The images were reconstructed with and without DLR in super-resolution mode. The image quality was rated in six domains. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and image sharpness were measured. Results: The mean acquisition time was 281±23 s for the standard and 140±12 s for the short acquisition (P<0.0001). DLR images had higher sharpness compared to non-DLR (P<0.001). Short and short-DLR had lower SNR than the standard and standard-DLR (P<0.001). The perceived image quality of short-DLR was rated better in all categories compared to the standard sequence (P<0.001 to P=0.004). All domains of subjective evaluation were correlated with measured image sharpness (P<0.001). Conclusions: T2-TSE acquisition of the prostate accelerated using CS combined with DLR reconstruction provides images with increased sharpness that have a superior quality as perceived by human readers compared to standard T2-TSE. The perceived image quality is correlated with measured image contrast.

Even non-expert radiologists report chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) on CT pulmonary angiography with high sensitivity and almost perfect agreement.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement of CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in the detection of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and its features among radiologists of different levels of experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center, single-blinded study, three radiologists with different levels of experience in CT imaging (R1:15 years, R2:6 years, and R3:3 years) evaluated CTPA of 51 patients ultimately diagnosed with CTEPH (European Society of Cardiology guidelines) and 49 patients without CTEPH in random order to assess the presence of CTEPH, its features in the pulmonary artery tree, proximal level of involvement, bronchial artery hypertrophy, mosaic perfusion, and right heart overload. RESULTS: CTPAs of 51 patients with CTEPH (median age, 66 years (IQR 56-72), 28 men) and 49 patients without CTEPH (median age, 65 years (IQR 50-74), 25 men) were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity for the detection of CTEPH was 100% (all radiologists) and 100% (R1), 96% (R2), and 96% (R3) with almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.95). The sensitivity and specificity for detecting CTEPH by mosaic perfusion would be 89% (95%CI 83-93%) and 81% (74-87%). The level of pulmonary artery involvement was reported with moderate agreement (κ = 0.54, 95%CI 0.40-0.65). Substantial agreement was found in the evaluation of mosaic attenuation (κ = 0.75, 95%CI 0.64-0.84), right heart overload (κ = 0.68, 95%CI 0.56-0.79), and bronchial artery hypertrophy (0.71, 95%CI 0.59-0.82) which were the best predictors of CTEPH (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: CTPA has high sensitivity and specificity in detecting CTEPH and almost perfect agreement among radiologists of different levels of expertise. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CT pulmonary angiography can be used as a first-line imaging modality in patients with suspected chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) even when interpreted by non-CTEPH experts. KEY POINTS: • CT pulmonary angiography has high sensitivity and specificity in detecting chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and almost perfect interobserver agreement among radiologists of different levels of expertise. • Substantial agreement exists in the assessment of mosaic attenuation, right heart overload, and bronchial artery hypertrophy, which are the best predictors of CTEPH.

Quantification and significance of extraprostatic findings on prostate MRI: a retrospective analysis and three-tier classification.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify extraprostatic findings (EPFs) on prostate MRI, estimate the proportion of reported and unreported EPFs, assess their clinical importance, and propose standardized reporting of EPFs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prostate 3-T MRI studies, reports, and clinical data from 623 patients (age 67.9 ± 8.2 years) were retrospectively analyzed and re-evaluated for the presence of EPFs and their clinical significance: E1-no finding or findings that have no clinical significance; E2-potentially significant findings; and E3-significant findings. RESULTS: Secondary reading identified 1236 EPFs in 593 patients (1.98 ± 1.13 EPFs per patient, no EPFs in 30 patients), from which 468 (37.8%) were mentioned in the original report. The most common findings included diverticulosis (44% of patients), hydrocele (34%), inguinal fat hernia (16%), and bladder wall trabecular hypertrophy (15%). There were 80 (6.5%) E2 EPFs and 30 (2.4%) E3 EPFs. From E3 EPFs, 10 (33%) were not originally reported. A workup was suggested in 35 (52%) of the 67 originally reported E2 and E3 findings with follow-up and performed in 20 (30%). Fourteen (21%) EPFs in 11 patients influenced their management. Four experienced radiologists originally reported 1.8 to 2.5 findings per patient (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: EPFs on prostate MRI are frequent, but only 2.4% are clinically significant (E3), and 33% of these are not reported. Only 30% of E2 and E3 findings are further explored, and 21% influence patient management. We suggest that an "E" category should be attached to the PI-RADS system to identify the presence of EPFs that require further workup. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Extraprostatic findings on prostate MRI are frequent, but only 2.4% are clinically significant (E3), and 33% of these are not reported. We advocate standardized reporting of extraprostatic findings indicating their clinical significance. KEY POINTS: • Extraprostatic findings on prostate MRI are frequent with an average of two findings per patient. • 2.4% of extraprostatic findings are significant, and 33% of these are not reported. • There is a significant variability among experienced radiologists in reporting extraprostatic findings.